Mediation in co-ownership issues.

Mediation and arbitration in co-ownership issues offer many benefits, among which speeding up the process is not the least.  This swiftness is very important to people having to meet every day in an elevator while being in conflict.    »

Common expenses: when does the contribution start?

The syndicate intends to replace the doors and windows of the building. What can you do if you disagree?

Condo fees, private and common portions, common portions for restrictive use and intermediate portions. What should you know?

All the articles

COMING SOON

Do not miss!

Friday, june 22nd 2012, a conference organized by la Chambre Nationale des Experts en copropriété at the Yatch Club de France.

What's new?

Since april 2010, the Centre de formation en copropriété has started offering recognized professional development courses in co-ownership. Click here to visit the web site.

Now available in multi-media, the course on 'Les assemblées de copropriétaires', by Mes Yves Papineau and Christine Gagnon, intended for both co-ownership professionals and ordinary people.
Multi-media from Wilson-Lafleur. Click for more details.
Click for more details.

La Chambre des notaires met sur pied un groupe de travail sur la copropriété.
The minister of Justice, Mrs. Kathleen Weil, is happy to cooperate with La Chambre des notaires du Québec in the constitution of a work group dedicated to co-ownership. Me Papineau will be part of it. Follow the link to read the complete story.

 

LINKS
 

Le mardi 08 janvier 2008

Votation at the general meeting of the co-owners.


by Me Serge Abud,

lawyer, PAPINEAU AVOCATS inc.


Relative or absolute majority?


The general rule is that the decisions of the syndicate are taken by a majority of the co-owners present or represented at the meeting, with the exception of special majorities stipulated in articles 1097 and 1098 of the Civil Code of Quebec.


Knowing that each co-owner is entitled to a number of votes proportionate to the relative value of his fraction, it should be understood that it is not the number of persons present that is taken into account, but the total of the votes expressed by the co-owners. So we have to be careful whenever a vote is taken by a show of hands. In some cases a detailed account is necessary, for example when a vote appears too tight or if someone holds an important number of votes or has many proxys. This could be done by calling out the votes or by a written votation.


The majority of votes of the co-owners shall include those who abstained to vote as well as those whose ballot paper was rejected.


A decision is therefore legally valid only if approved by fifty percent plus one of the votes of the co-owners present or represented at the meeting. Make no mistake about it: the majority of the co-owners or the greatest number of votes expressed are not the same thing as fifty percent plus one of the votes of the co-owners present or represented at the meeting.


This distinction is very important to make in order to ensure that the decisions taken during the general meeting are lawful.



Copyright © 2003-2012  Papineau Avocats inc. All rights reserved.